<p>Simulation with 100 unknown QTL, 500 markers and 250 individuals in each training and testing set: training correlations, predictive correlations and predictive mean-squared error (MSE) for 100 comparisons between bagged GBLUP (BGBLUP, 25 bootstrap samples) and GBLUP at two levels of “under-regularization”.</p
Simulation results obtained on simulated data (4 tables). In the Additional file we report the accur...
<p>The figure plots the mean (A) genotype error and (B) clone frequency error as a function of the...
(A) Analysis results in absence of outliers; (B) analysis results in presence of 5% outliers. Thresh...
<p>Simulation with 100 unknown QTL, 500 markers and 250 individuals in each training and testing set...
<p>Simulation with 100 unknown QTL, 500 markers and 250 individuals in each training and testing set...
<p>Left panel: variance (VAR) among 500 GBLUPs in each of 500 bootstrap samples. The horizontal line...
<p>Simulation with 20 unknown QTL, 200 markers and 500 individuals: “genomic correlations” among 500...
<p>Left panel: distribution of 200 effects within each of 4 bootstrap samples (1–4), and within the ...
<p> is coefficient of determination of the regression fitted.</p><p>The simulation involved a traini...
<p> is the coefficient of determination of the regression fitted. The simulation involved a training...
<p>Results are showed on simple and complex traits through the 10 replicates of the simulation. Figu...
<p>(A) QQ plot of -log10 p values from SNP set tests using different SNP weights under the null simu...
<p>We trained the models with equal training sample sizes (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub> = <i>N</i><sub>2</su...
<p>We also compared here two combinations of training – candidate sets (i.e. the two figures on the ...
Results of sensitivity analyses across different splits of the training and test sets. We created 1,...
Simulation results obtained on simulated data (4 tables). In the Additional file we report the accur...
<p>The figure plots the mean (A) genotype error and (B) clone frequency error as a function of the...
(A) Analysis results in absence of outliers; (B) analysis results in presence of 5% outliers. Thresh...
<p>Simulation with 100 unknown QTL, 500 markers and 250 individuals in each training and testing set...
<p>Simulation with 100 unknown QTL, 500 markers and 250 individuals in each training and testing set...
<p>Left panel: variance (VAR) among 500 GBLUPs in each of 500 bootstrap samples. The horizontal line...
<p>Simulation with 20 unknown QTL, 200 markers and 500 individuals: “genomic correlations” among 500...
<p>Left panel: distribution of 200 effects within each of 4 bootstrap samples (1–4), and within the ...
<p> is coefficient of determination of the regression fitted.</p><p>The simulation involved a traini...
<p> is the coefficient of determination of the regression fitted. The simulation involved a training...
<p>Results are showed on simple and complex traits through the 10 replicates of the simulation. Figu...
<p>(A) QQ plot of -log10 p values from SNP set tests using different SNP weights under the null simu...
<p>We trained the models with equal training sample sizes (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub> = <i>N</i><sub>2</su...
<p>We also compared here two combinations of training – candidate sets (i.e. the two figures on the ...
Results of sensitivity analyses across different splits of the training and test sets. We created 1,...
Simulation results obtained on simulated data (4 tables). In the Additional file we report the accur...
<p>The figure plots the mean (A) genotype error and (B) clone frequency error as a function of the...
(A) Analysis results in absence of outliers; (B) analysis results in presence of 5% outliers. Thresh...